References

  • Adner R, Levinthal DA. 2004. What is Not a Real Option: Considering Boundaries for the Application of Real Options to Business Strategy. Academy of Management Review 29(1): 74-85
  • Boston Consulting Group (2005) Innovation 2005. www.bcg.com.
  • Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. 1998. Competing on the edge: Strategy as structured chaos. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Burgelman, R. A. 1983. A model of the interaction of strategic behavior, corporate context and the concept of strategy. Academy of Management Review, 8(1): 61-70.
  • Burgelman, R. A. 1991. Intraorganizational ecology of strategy making and organizational adaptation: Theory and field research. Organization Science, 2(3): 239-262.
  • Burgelman, R. A. 1996. A process model of strategic business exit: Implications for an evolutionary perspective on strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 193.
  • Camison-Zornoza, C., Lapiedra-Alcami, R., Segarra-Cipres, M., & Boronat-Navarro, M. 2004. A Meta-Analysis of Innovation and Organizational Size. Organization Studies, 25: 331-361.
  • Chesbrough, H. W. 2001. The era of open innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review (Spring): 35-41.
  • Colarelli OConnor, G., & Rice, M. P. 2001. Opportunity recognition and breakthrough innovation in large established firms. California Management Review, 43(2): 95-116.
  • Davis, C. R. 2002. Calculated risk: a framework for evaluating product development. MIT Sloan Management Review, 43(4): 71-77.
  • EFQM 2005. The EFQM Framework for Innovation. Measuring and Improving Your Ability to Innovate. Brussels. Belgium.
  • Eisenhardt KM, Brown SL. 1998. Competing on the edge. Harvard Business School Press: Cambridge, Mass.
  • Eisenhardt KM, Martin JA. 2000. Dynamic capabilities: What are they. Strategic Management Journal 21(10-11): 1105-1121
  • Gavetti G, Levinthal DA. 2000. Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Administrative Science Quarterly 45(1): 113-137
  • Floyd, S. W., & Lane, P. J. 2000. Strategizing Throughout the Organization: Managing Role Conflict in Strategic Renewal. Academy of Management Review, 25:154-177.
  • Hamdouch, A., & Samuelides, E. 2001. Innovations Dynamics in Mobile Phone Services in France. European Journal of Innovation Management, 4: 153-162.
  • Hamel, Gary 2006. The Why, What and How of Management Innovation, Harvard Business Review. February 2006.
  • Huston, Larry, and Sakkab, Nabil 2006. Connect and Develop – Inside Procter & Gamble’s New Model of Innovation. Harvard Business Review, March 2006.
  • IBM 2006. Global Innovation Outlook 2.0 IBM Corporation publication.
  • IBM 2006. Global CEO Study. IBM Corporation publication.
  • Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. 1996. The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy Into Action, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
  • Kaplan, R.S and Norton, D.P. 2000. The Strategy Focused Organization - How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Mass.
  • Lloyd, C. 2004. Success, Renewal and the Entrepreneurial Mindset, Strategic Balance: Driving Innovation and Maintaining Performance. Puerto Rico: SMS.
  • McAdam, R., & McClelland, J. 2002. Individual and Team-Based Idea Generation Within Innovation Management: Organisational and Research Agendas. European Journal of Innovation Management, 5: 86-97.
  • McGrath RG. 1997. A real options logic for initiating technology positioning investments. Academy of Management Review 22(4): 974-996
  • McGrath RG. 2001. Exploratory learning, innovative capacity, and managerial oversight. Academy of Management Journal 44(1): 118-131
  • Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, Mass; London: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  • Ramirez , R. & Ruddle, K. 2005 The Oxford Strategic Renewal Research Programme. - Practitioner Conference, February 2005. Templeton College, University of Oxford.
  • Roberts, R.M. 1989. Serendipity - Accidental Discoveries in Science. John Wiley & Sons Inc. New York.
  • Schumpeter, J. A. 1934. The theory of economic development. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
  • Shepherd, C., & Ahmed, P. K. 2000 NPD Frameworks: A HolisticExamination. European Journal of Innovation Management., 3:160
  • Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 28(7): 509-533
  • Teece, D. J. 1986. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15: 285-305.
  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7): 509-533.
  • Trigeorgis L. 1996. Real options: Managerial flexibility and strategy in resource allocation. MIT Press: Cambridge, Mass.
  • Troy Kathryn 2004. Making Innovation Work – From Strategy to Practice. Research Report. Conference Board. New York.
  • Van de Ven, A. H., Polley, D. E., Garud, R., & Venkataraman, S. 1999. The Innovation Journey. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Witcher, B. 2004. A conceptual framework for Hoshin Kanri and the balanced scoreboard. Paper presented at the Strategic Management Society, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
  • Zacharakis, A. L., & Meyer, G. D. 2000. The Potential of Actuarial Decision Models: Can They Improve the Venture Capital Investment Decision? Journal of Business Venturing, 15: 323-3

< Research Collaboration | ^ Prospectus

Submitted by daviding on Mon, 2006-09-04 20:51.