<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://rendez.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Rendez - References: The nature of services businesses - Comments</title>
 <link>http://rendez.org/en/ref-the-nature-of-services-businesses</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;References: The nature of services businesses&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>References: The nature of services businesses</title>
 <link>http://rendez.org/en/ref-the-nature-of-services-businesses</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt; Services businesses are conventionally considered different from product-oriented business, but in what ways? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is the logic of service-oriented businesses different? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Stephen L. Vargo and Robert F. Lusch, “Evolving a Services Dominant Logic”, Journal of Marketing, Volume 68, Number 1, (January 2004), pp. 1-17.
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;A good summary of the shift from goods-centered model of exchange to a services-oriented model of exchange. Six attributes (on Table 2) and eight foundational premises are proposed. &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;(supplemental) Ruth N. Bolton (editor), “Invited Commentaries on ‘Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing’“, Journal of Marketing, Volume 68, Number 1, (January 2004), pp. 18-27.
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Some different perspectives on various sections of Vargo &amp;amp; Lusch (2004). Note that many of these commentaries are written by leading thinkers in marketing, and thus, they’re pre-sold on the ideas! (Can you figure out which ones they are?) &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt; (supplemental) Stephen L. Vargo and Robert F. Lusch, &amp;quot; The Four Service Marketing Myths: Remnants of a Goods-Based, Manufacturing Model”, Journal of Service Research, Volume 6, Number 4, (May 2004) 324-335.
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Some of this material is covered in Vargo &amp;amp; Lusch (2004a), but note that they speak here to four characteristics (including perishability) whereas they had previously mentioned three. The focus is in making the transition from a manufacturing orientation to a services orientation. &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Although the conventional wisdom has been to focus on four characteristics of services (IHIP), ownership considerations may be more clarifying. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Christopher Lovelock and Evert Gummesson, “Whither Services Marketing? In Search of a New Paradigm and Fresh Perspectives”, Journal of Service Research, Volume 7, Number 1, August 2004, pp. 20-41.
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;In addition to the four characteristics (intangibility, heterogeneity, inseparability and perishability) that differentiate services from goods, these researchers suggest that the pattern of ownership is different.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These references are suggested as part of the &lt;a href=&quot;/en/stadia-isbm-2006-sessions&quot; title=&quot;Stadia 2006 Sessions&quot;&gt;Stadia 2006 International Service Business Management Sessions&lt;/a&gt;. Please respond with comments to suggest additional readings or express opinions on those above.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;


</description>
 <comments>http://rendez.org/en/ref-the-nature-of-services-businesses#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 19:35:04 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>daviding</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">42 at http://rendez.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
